Compare Contrast Fall of Han China and Roman Empire

Last Updated: 21 Mar 2023
Pages: 2 Views: 2133

The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so. The Roman and Han empires were similar in their falls because of they both fell to nomadic invaders.

Nomads attacked the empires to try and conquer them. The Romans were attacked by Germanic tribes and Han China was attacked by the Huns. Because both empires borders were so large, they were unable to fully protect their borders making it easy for their invaders to defeat them. The Han and the Roman Empires failing due to nomadic invaders is similar to the fall of the Gupta because one of the main reasons they fell was because of nomadic invaders conquering them and then splitting them up into regional kingdoms. The Roman and Han empires falls’ were similar because of their decline in economic trade.

Trade was extremely important for the Romans and Chinese so when it began to decline, so did the rest of the empire. As both empires borders expanded, they had to take more of the military to defend the borders rather than the trade routes, so the trade routes became compromised. People began stealing goods from merchants making the routes extremely dangerous. Because their was much less trade, the taxes to the government were greatly reduced so they had to tax the people more. Most people could not afford the hike in taxes so the government was still unable to get all of their money, thus resulting in decline.

Order custom essay Compare Contrast Fall of Han China and Roman Empire with free plagiarism report

feat icon 450+ experts on 30 subjects feat icon Starting from 3 hours delivery
Get Essay Help

This is similar to the decline of the Qin Dynasty because the Qin Dynasty had to raise taxes on peasants to try and support the government, causing it to decline as well. The fall of the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire are different because the Han fell to revolts whereas it was not a major cause in the fall in the Roman Empire. The Han Dynasty had many revolts; an example is the Yellow Turban Revolt, caused by frustration in the government. In Rome there were not many revolts because the government provided the peasants with bread and circuses in order to boost morale and keep them loyal to the government, which worked fairly well.

The effects of the falls of the Han and the Roman Empires are different because China was able to make a comeback whereas Rome was not. After the Han fell, China was able to pull together, largely due to the economic and culture unity, whereas Romans were unable to do so. The Roman empire fell separately so the people in the eastern and western halves were very different, along with the economies. They were so different they could not come together, the government was far to fractured and the people were no longer united.

Related Questions

on Compare Contrast Fall of Han China and Roman Empire

How does the fall of the Roman Empire compare to the fall of the Han Dynasty?
The fall of the Roman Empire and the fall of the Han Dynasty were both caused by a combination of internal and external factors. Both empires experienced a period of decline due to political instability, economic decline, and military defeats. However, the Han Dynasty fell much more quickly than the Roman Empire, as it was conquered by the Xiongnu in 220 CE, while the Roman Empire fell over a period of centuries.
In which you compare and contrast the Han and Roman empires?
The Han and Roman empires were two of the most influential empires in world history. Both empires had a strong central government, a large population, and a powerful military. However, the Han Empire was located in East Asia and was heavily influenced by Confucianism, while the Roman Empire was located in Europe and was heavily influenced by Greco-Roman culture. Additionally, the Han Empire was ruled by a monarchy, while the Roman Empire was ruled by a republic.
What is the difference between Han China and the Roman Empire?
The main difference between Han China and the Roman Empire is that Han China was an empire based in East Asia, while the Roman Empire was based in Europe. Additionally, the Han Empire was founded in 206 BCE and lasted until 220 CE, while the Roman Empire was founded in 27 BCE and lasted until 476 CE.
What were the similarities between the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty?
The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty both had strong centralized governments, with a focus on law and order. They both had a strong military presence, and both had a complex system of taxation. Additionally, both empires had a strong emphasis on trade and commerce, and both had a complex system of social classes.

Cite this Page

Compare Contrast Fall of Han China and Roman Empire. (2018, Jan 01). Retrieved from https://phdessay.com/compare-contrast-fall-of-han-china-and-roman-empire/

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Run a free check or have your essay done for you

plagiarism ruin image

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Save time and let our verified experts help you.

Hire writer